<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>BZB Studios - Latest Comments in The Cost Of SEO</title><link>http://bzbstudios.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bzbstudios.disqus.com/the_cost_of_seo/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:53:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Cost Of SEO</title><link>http://www.bzbstudios.com/blog/?p=14#comment-2750997</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would say it is safe to say you get what you pay for, as a general rule, but not as a golden rule.  I think there are great SEOs with fair prices out there.  I think one of the main things to avoid are the really cheap services that brag results for $100-$200 a month or something of that nature.  I just don't see those are being quality.  I charge about $500 a month for my services and they are 100% comprehensive.  This is very competitive and I do well for my clients.  However, in time at some point I may raise the price.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>